Alternatives to Graphite for B2B SaaS SEO and AI Search in 2026 (Ranked)

Graphite here means Graphite Growth, Inc. (graphite.io), the research-driven growth agency run by Ethan Smith, its CEO, not the Graphite code-review tool at graphite.com.

Graphite Growth competitors compared

Every price, offer and term above comes from the agency's own site, read on 6 November 2026. "Not published" means the agency's /pricing URL, homepage and AI search service page showed no fee that day. iPullRank publishes investment ranges with no period, so no "per month" is added to them.

Every agency listed runs a dedicated AI search, GEO or AEO service page and publishes a client result on its own site. Each was also named in at least 42 of the 594 AI answers that named Graphite on the 141 non-branded buyer questions LoudFace tracks in Peec AI, 9 October to 6 November 2026. The engine split for the other eight is further down.

Graphite Growth at a glance

What does Graphite Growth do well, and who does it fit?

Graphite sells research first. The homepage hero reads "Our AI research team identifies the 5% of strategies that drive impact in AEO, SEO & performance marketing. We help companies like Webflow, n8n & Hinge Health grow revenue without waste." Its team block puts a Chief AI Officer, Gregory Druck, PhD, and a senior data scientist beside the CEO. Ethan Smith also teaches SEO and AEO at Reforge, according to his author page.

Research is Graphite's strongest asset. Graphite publishes studies under its Five Percent label, and they are worth reading whether you hire Graphite or not. Its n8n attribution study, dated 17 June 2026, found that "GA4 last-touch attributed just ~1% of n8n's conversions to AEO," while n8n's post-conversion survey put the figure near 9%, which Graphite calls "a roughly 10x gap." If your board asks why AI search deserves budget when analytics shows almost nothing, that study is the argument.

Its AI search offer, in its own words. The AEO page opens with "Great SEO is free AEO. Offsite is the real difference." Under "We Are A Full-Service Team" it lists prompt research, citation-ready content, brand sentiment and reputation management, technical AEO, citation tracking and analytics, and offsite AEO with a Reddit strategy. On measurement it says "We track which AI engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews) cite you, on which questions, against which competitors." The prompt set is "typically 200+ queries a quarter".

Proof. Graphite's flagship result is Webflow. "Since 2022, Graphite and Webflow have partnered to drive SEO growth, achieving 3M nonbrand clicks and a 2.5x ROI in 2024." For AI search, Graphite reports "94% share of voice growth from LLMs (increase from 33% to 64%)" and "2x the amount of sign-ups coming from LLMs (increase from 4% to 8%)". Read the 94% carefully: it is growth in Graphite's own share-of-voice metric, from 33% to 64%. It is not a 94% share. The other case studies report Google traffic: "BetterUp Grew Monthly Organic Traffic from 74K to 3.8M" and "MasterClass Grew Monthly Non-Branded Traffic from 0 to 571K". The Fourthwall study is mainly about the Graphite Platform, Graphite's SEO software. Its CEO rates the company's SEO before Graphite at "a 3 out of 10" and says that "with access to the platform and the Graphite team" it reached "a 9 out of 10 in a matter of months."

Scope. Graphite's scope runs past organic search. The homepage names performance marketing beside AEO and SEO, its open roles include a Paid Media Growth Director, and its research library covers ChatGPT ads. On SEO implementation, it says "We work with our clients' own technical or engineering teams and provide guidance and recommendations for implementation and execution." Writing can be "either full writing services or content planning and recommendations."

Who it fits, in its own words. The careers page lists "Premium, always" as its first value: "We partner with category-leading brands and hold ourselves to a higher bar than regular standards." If you are a fast-growing tech brand with an engineering team that can ship recommendations, a budget for a year of SEO, and a taste for data-heavy strategy, Graphite is built for you.

Why do B2B SaaS teams look for a Graphite alternative?

The reasons come from Graphite's own pages, and they concern price, term, pace, implementation and proof.

1. No published price. graphite.io/pricing returned a not-found page on 6 November 2026. No fee appears on the homepage, the AEO page, the SEO page or the case studies. Every Talk To Us button leads to a form that asks for your name, work email, company URL, how you heard about Graphite and what it can help with. There is no budget question. If you want to compare written prices before you book calls, Graphite gives you nothing to compare.

2. A twelve-month SEO minimum. The SEO page answers "What's a typical engagement length?" with "Twelve months minimum. SEO is a portfolio compounder. Shorter engagements don't give the SEO and editorial work enough time to mature into traffic and rankings." The AEO page states no term, so ask whether AEO-only work carries the same one.

3. A slow clock on SEO, by Graphite's own account. "Compounding typically starts around six months, with meaningful traffic and ranking shifts showing up between nine and twelve months. We don't promise faster timelines." If you need visible output in the first month, look at agencies that commit to week-one delivery in writing.

4. Recommendations, with your engineers doing the build. Graphite's SEO page says it works with your own technical or engineering teams and gives "guidance and recommendations for implementation and execution." A team with no spare engineering time will want an agency that ships the changes itself.

5. One AI search case study. Of Graphite's four case studies, only Webflow reports an AI search result. The others report Google traffic or software use. If you want several AI search results to compare before you sign, the index is thin.

A paid media need is not on that list. If you hire Graphite for performance marketing as well as organic, note that Omniscient Digital and Minuttia both rule paid media out on their own pages. Obility is the closest match.

What do AI engines say about Graphite?

LoudFace tracks 141 non-branded buyer questions in Peec AI. Between 9 October and 6 November 2026, Graphite came up on 77 of them:

• ChatGPT named Graphite in 393 of 4,089 answers (9.6%), at an average position of 4.58 when named, 15th of 53 tracked brands.
• Perplexity named it in 109 of 4,089 answers (2.7%), at an average position of 3.40, 20th of 53.
• Google AI Overviews named it in 92 of 3,960 answers (2.3%), at an average position of 4.64, 31st of 53.

ChatGPT names Graphite more than three times as often as either other engine. Perplexity places it highest when it does name it.

Who the engines name beside it. Omniscient Digital appeared in 510 of the 594 answers that named Graphite: 361 on ChatGPT, 96 on Perplexity and 53 on Google AI Overviews. iPullRank followed with 305 (250 / 32 / 23), then First Page Sage with 262 (201 / 25 / 36) and Siege Media with 254 (206 / 35 / 13). Animalz (208: 172 / 17 / 19), Obility (132: 125 / 0 / 7), Minuttia (57: 39 / 6 / 12) and Grow and Convert (42: 16 / 21 / 5) complete the set ranked below.

How the engines describe it. The engines repeat Graphite's own framing: research-led growth for venture-backed tech, with Webflow as the proof.

• Google AI Overviews, 9 October, answering "Which agencies can show before-and-after AI share of voice numbers for a B2B SaaS client?": "A research-driven growth agency working across AEO, SEO, and performance marketing, with public case studies showcasing dramatic LLM share-of-voice growth and sign-up increases for software clients."
• Google AI Overviews, 30 October, answering "Top GEO agencies 2026", labelled Graphite as "Best for Venture-Backed Startups" and credited its "research-driven growth models".
• ChatGPT, 20 October, answering "Who are the leading GEO consultants for B2B software companies right now?", ranked Graphite fourth: "Best for scaling organic growth".
• Perplexity, 22 October, answering "Alternatives to iPullRank for AI search optimization for a mid-size SaaS", wrote that "Graphite Growth looks like the closest agency alternative if you want a broader growth and SEO program".

Most of the questions that surface Graphite ask for an AI search agency in some form: 68 of the 77 name AI search, AEO, GEO, LLMs or an AI engine. Only 5 of the 77 use the term GEO or generative engine optimization, and those 5 drew 123 of the 594 answers that named Graphite. "Alternatives to iPullRank for AI search optimization for a mid-size SaaS" named it in 26 ChatGPT and 24 Perplexity answers. "Top GEO agencies 2026" named it 20, 13 and 6 times across ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews.

The price is where the engines guess. Most ChatGPT answers that name Graphite give it no price. When ChatGPT does address the price, it most often writes "Custom pricing", "Custom quote" or "Contact for pricing", which matches the site, and some answers place Graphite in a monthly budget band instead. One ChatGPT answer on 15 October advised buyers to "establish early whether Graphite can deliver meaningful execution within $10,000–$20,000 monthly." Perplexity called Graphite's starting price "unspecified" on 20 October. Google AI Overviews went further four days later and claimed a "Publicly listed starting price of $10,000/month." graphite.io lists no price at all. A second Google AI Overviews answer, on 28 October, put Graphite in an "Enterprise / Full-Stack Agencies: $10,000 – $50,000+ / month" band. If an AI answer gave you Graphite's price, treat it as a guess until Graphite puts a figure in writing.

None of the 594 answers confused Graphite Growth with the graphite.com code-review tool.

The best Graphite Growth alternatives in 2026, ranked

1. LoudFace: best for B2B SaaS and fintech that want SEO, AEO and GEO as one program

Best for: B2B SaaS and fintech teams that want SEO, AEO and GEO run as one program, with AI visibility reported engine by engine and a team shipping in week one.

Starting price (checked 6 Nov 2026): LoudFace engagements start from $5k/mo, scoped on the intro call, with a 2h response time on every tier. Its GEO programs start from $5,000 per month on a three-month initial engagement, with no setup fee. For the right partnership, LoudFace ties part of its fee to results.

What it does: LoudFace describes itself on its SEO and AEO service page as "a full-stack organic growth agency for B2B SaaS and fintech, with AI visibility measured per engine." The first month is the most packed one. Kickoff happens within 48 hours of signature, with access set up, the Scoreboard live and the first fixes and calibration articles shipping in the same week. You meet your delivery team and see shipped work inside five days.

AI search offer: "We run SEO, AEO, and GEO as one program." The GEO service promises "Weekly share-of-answer reporting split by engine, never blended."

Proof: for 18 months LoudFace was Toku's growth partner. In the 30-day Peec AI reading ending 19 August 2026, Toku held 97.8% AI visibility on the category's top stablecoin payroll prompt, "Best stablecoin payroll providers," the highest of any brand on that prompt. For Transalis, on the same 73 tracked buyer prompts, comparing August with 24 to 30 October 2026, ChatGPT went from naming it in 7.7% of answers to 24.2%, Google AI Overviews from 7.2% to 18.0%, and Perplexity from 0.7% to 7.2%. LoudFace's own AI visibility went from 11.4% of answers in June 2026 to 24.9% over 18 to 28 September 2026, on the 55 non-branded buyer prompts it has tracked since June. On those same prompts, ChatGPT went from naming LoudFace in 25.0% of its answers in August to 35.9%, Google AI Overviews from 10.5% to 20.8%, and Perplexity held near 18%. More results sit on the LoudFace case-study index.

Compared with Graphite: a published starting price you can read before the call, a three-month initial engagement against Graphite's twelve-month SEO minimum, and shipped work inside five days. LoudFace also reports AI visibility split by engine every week.

Skip it if: your budget for organic and AI search is under $5,000 a month.

2. Omniscient Digital: best for B2B software that wants organic only, on an annual budget

Best for: B2B software companies that want organic growth and AI search from one agency, with a full-service annual budget.

Starting price (checked 6 Nov 2026): "Full-service engagements start at $120,000/year," on Omniscient Digital's homepage and why-us page.

What it does: "Omniscient Digital is an organic growth agency that helps B2B software businesses turn SEO, GEO, and content into growth channels." It works from Austin, Texas and New York, by the addresses on its pages.

AI search offer: the AEO page leads with "Increase your brand's visibility in AI search and get recommended by LLMs."

Proof: on its homepage, Omniscient Digital says "Convert grew LLM Visibility 81% and AI Citations 140% in 60 days".

Compared with Graphite: the agency AI engines put beside Graphite most often, in 361 ChatGPT, 96 Perplexity and 53 Google AI Overviews answers of the 594. Omniscient Digital publishes its floor; Graphite publishes none.

Skip it if: $120,000 a year for full service is out of reach, or you want paid media from the same firm. Omniscient Digital's why-us page says "We don't run paid media, social, or email."

More options in alternatives to Omniscient Digital.

3. iPullRank: best for enterprise and mid-market AI search programs

Best for: enterprise and mid-market brands that want AI search strategy from a technical, research-led team.

Starting price (checked 6 Nov 2026): iPullRank's AI Search page sorts buyers into three stages with investment ranges and no period stated. Emerging, the stage for brands that need clarity before scale, is $30K to $150K. Growth, for brands ready to challenge the market, is $150K to $500K. Elite is $500K+.

What it does: iPullRank's footer calls it "a pioneering AI Search and content marketing agency leading the way in Relevance Engineering, GEO, Audience-Focused SEO, and Content Strategy." Its about page: "When Search Engine Land Marketer of the Year, Mike King founded iPullRank".

AI search offer: "In a nutshell, GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) is the strategy for optimizing your website and content for visibility in AI Search."

Proof: iPullRank's homepage names a client type rather than the client: "One of the world's biggest banks paused their paid ad spend because of the success of our content engineering strategy."

Compared with Graphite: the closest fit for AI search programs at larger brands. iPullRank shows its investment ranges, where Graphite shows none.

Skip it if: you want a monthly retainer price before the first call. iPullRank's ranges carry no period.

More options in alternatives to iPullRank.

4. First Page Sage: best for B2B SaaS that judges search on demos, trials and payback

Best for: B2B SaaS teams that judge organic search on demo requests, trials and payback, on month-to-month terms.

Starting price (checked 6 Nov 2026): First Page Sage's own pricing report says "Our data showed that First Page Sage's published range of $6,000 to $12,000 per month sits within the market's Growth tier". Terms are "Month to month, with no annual lock-in."

What it does: "For 18 years, we have turned B2B SaaS websites into a dependable source of demo requests, trials, and qualified pipeline." The same page frames the job today as beating your competitors on Google and in AI answers at once.

AI search offer: SEO and GEO for B2B SaaS, aimed at Google and AI answers together.

Proof: across its SaaS campaigns, First Page Sage reports an average with no client named: "Our SaaS campaigns average 5.2 months to breakeven, 58% first-year ROI, and 702% ROI across the first three years." It also says "We helped our client become the most-recommended provider on AI tools including ChatGPT and Claude", without naming the client.

Compared with Graphite: a written monthly range and month-to-month terms, against no published price and a twelve-month SEO minimum.

Skip it if: a senior program is out of budget this year. First Page Sage's own not-a-fit list says "We stay premium deliberately."

More options in alternatives to First Page Sage.

5. Siege Media: best for SaaS content at scale, with digital PR and affiliate

Best for: SaaS brands that want content, digital PR and affiliate partnerships aimed at AI answers.

Starting price (checked 6 Nov 2026): Siege Media's content marketing FAQ says "Our minimums for content marketing are currently $8,000 per month." It asks for a 12-month contract "given the long term nature of SEO," and "all of our contracts include a 30 day out clause to grant you flexibility should budgets or strategies change." That $8,000 is the content-marketing minimum.

What it does: "Full-service GEO. We make brands the answer in search." Siege Media's services line reads "GEO consulting. SEO consulting. Content. Digital PR. Affiliate. Reddit."

Proof: in the first two years of its engagement, Siege Media says Zapier saw "a $7.2 million increase in traffic value to the blog and a 290% increase in monthly organic traffic to the site".

Compared with Graphite: a twelve-month ask like Graphite's SEO minimum, softened by a 30-day out clause, plus a published content minimum. Digital PR and affiliate cover the off-site side Graphite calls "the real difference".

Skip it if: your content budget sits below $8,000 a month, or you want no annual contract at all.

More options in alternatives to Siege Media.

6. Animalz: best for B2B SaaS editorial content and SEO

Best for: B2B SaaS brands that want a content marketing and SEO agency with an AEO audit and mention outreach on top.

Starting price (checked 6 Nov 2026): not published. Animalz's /pricing URL returned not found, and the AEO page shows no fee.

What it does: "A Content Marketing and SEO Agency for Leading B2B SaaS Brands." Its about page says "We've evolved into a remote-based global brand of thought leaders, SEO experts, brand builders, and content operators."

AI search offer: "Optimize for AI search before your competitors do." Its AEO audit shows where AI mentions or misses your brand across Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini.

Proof: the Animalz customers page features "How SupportLogic AI-Proofed and 5X Its Organic Traffic in 12 Months".

Compared with Graphite: content first, with an AEO audit on top. Like Graphite, Animalz publishes no fee.

Skip it if: you want a written price before the first call.

More options in alternatives to Animalz.

7. Obility: best for B2B tech that wants SEO, GEO and paid media from one team

Best for: B2B tech and SaaS companies that want GEO and SEO run beside paid search and paid social, the closest swap for a buyer who uses Graphite for performance marketing too.

Starting price (checked 6 Nov 2026): Obility's pricing page says "Every engagement starts with the SEO & GEO core; add-ons are modular, pick any combination based on your goals." The SEO & GEO Core is $5,450/mo, with content at $400 a piece. Its packages run Guide at $2,850+/mo, which the page sells as strategic guidance for in-house teams, then Ascent at $6,500+/mo ("Startups building their paid media foundation") and Summit at $10,900+/mo ("Scaling teams running high-volume paid media"). On terms: "We recommend that the Ascent and Summit packages be 12-month annual agreements." and "Guide and Add-On services are designed to be month-to-month. We require a 45-day notice to cancel." The page states no term for the SEO & GEO Core itself.

What it does: "B2B Digital Marketing Agency for Tech & SaaS", with paid search, paid social and Reddit ads beside SEO.

AI search offer: "Obility is a B2B GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) agency that helps tech and SaaS companies show up where your buyers search in the AI Era: LLMs like ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Google AI Overviews, and Reddit." It adds, "We manage GEO alongside SEO for ultimate growth".

Proof: for Boomi, Obility reports "20 newly created content pieces ranked in Google's AI Overviews" and "40 previously existing blog posts optimized by Obility surfaced in AI-generated search responses". The case study carries no dates. A Sendoso testimonial on its pricing page says "More than doubled pipeline within a few months of coming on the account".

Compared with Graphite: paid media and organic from one team, like Graphite, with every package priced in public.

Skip it if: you want organic and AI search only, or you want AI search proof with dates attached.

8. Minuttia: best for established B2B SaaS investing in content-led AI search

Best for: established B2B SaaS companies that want content-led Google and AI search growth with no minimum commitment.

Starting price (checked 6 Nov 2026): no pricing page. Its intro form asks "What is your monthly growth budget for working with us?" and the lowest band on offer is $5K - $10K. The bands run up to $50K - $100K.

What it does: Minuttia's homepage promises "Forward-looking, business-driven strategy for Google and AI search that goes beyond keywords you can pull yourself from Ahrefs."

AI search offer: "We built our own AI visibility tool to track how your brand shows up across ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity."

Proof: for Meilisearch, Minuttia reports "LLM-driven traffic increased by 665%, while LLM conversions grew by 2,700% and the session conversion rate increased by 266%."

Compared with Graphite: "No minimum commitment," against Graphite's twelve months on SEO. Its own AEO listicle describes its ideal client as "$10M+ ARR, Series A+ funding, or MoM or YoY growth trending up".

Skip it if: you need paid media. Its why-us page says "We don't do paid media, influencer marketing, or anything else you might need."

More options in alternatives to Minuttia.

9. Grow and Convert: best for conversion-focused content built from customer interviews

Best for: B2B software companies that want conversion-focused content built from interviews with their own team.

Starting price (checked 6 Nov 2026): "Our base package is $10k/month and can scale up depending on how many keywords/articles you want per month." Its B2B SaaS GEO page ends "Starting at $10,000 per month." On terms: "We don't require a 6 or 12 month contract."

What it does: content marketing, SEO and GEO, built from what your sales and product teams know.

AI search offer: "How we get AI to recommend your B2B software when buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and AI Overviews".

Proof: for Toro TMS, "When we started in early 2025, roughly 5% of Toro's revenue came from branded inbound. Eighteen months later, that number is over 25%." It adds, "Booked revenue is up 362%".

Compared with Graphite: a published base price, no long contract and revenue-level proof.

Skip it if: $10,000 a month is above your budget, or your sales and product teams cannot give time for interviews.

More options in alternatives to Grow and Convert.

How do you choose a Graphite alternative?

Start from the reason you are leaving. If none of the reasons above applies, stay with Graphite. Its research library is useful to any buyer, and its Webflow result is tied to signups. If one does apply, match it here.

A wider ranked field of AI search agencies is in the best GEO agencies for B2B SaaS in 2026. The full question set for a pitch call is in questions to ask an AI search agency before you sign, and price bands across the market are in AEO agency pricing for B2B SaaS in 2026.

Whichever agencies make your shortlist, ask each of them the same four questions.

1. What is the price, in writing, and what period does it cover? Graphite publishes no figure. iPullRank's ranges have no period. Siege Media's $8,000 is a content minimum. AI answers fill the gaps with guesses, so get the figure and its period in an email.
2. Which engines get reported, and are they split? Ask for a sample report. A single blended AI number hides the engine you are losing on.
3. Which named client moved, on which prompt, and on whose metric? Graphite's Webflow figure is its own share-of-voice metric. Peec AI reports visibility. Ask which one you are looking at, plus the window and the tool.
4. Who ships the changes, and what ships in week one? Get the first month's deliverables in writing, and find out whether your engineers or the agency make the edits.