LoudFace is an AI-native SEO and GEO agency for cybersecurity companies: security SaaS, MSSPs, and compliance and infrastructure vendors. We get you ranked on Google and cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews, measured as share of answer. We have built and migrated sites for security companies like Hoxhunt, and our AI-search program took Toku, a platform in the compliance-heavy fintech category, from 0 to 86% AI-search visibility at position 2.4 on its core buyer prompt. Programs start at $5,000 per month.
Trusted by leading Cyber Security companies
Why Cyber Security companies struggle to rank.
They cannot tell SOC 2 from ISO 27001, or an MSSP from an MDR platform. Security buyers spot it in one paragraph, and so does Google's quality evaluation. Generic security blogging does not rank and does not convert.
A security leader asks ChatGPT or Perplexity which vendors to evaluate, and the engine answers with a roster pulled from pages you may be absent from. If no engine cites you, you are off the list before the evaluation even starts.
Security buyers need visible proof: named customers, certifications, and real technical depth. A page of keyword-stuffed content signals the opposite of the rigor they are buying, and the AI engines read that signal too.
LoudFace runs one program for security companies: SEO for Google rankings, GEO (generative engine optimization) for AI citations, and the technical-trust signals security buyers demand. Here is how the work maps to the cybersecurity segments we serve.
| Cybersecurity segment | What buyers search | What wins the answer |
|---|---|---|
| Security SaaS platforms | Category and "best tool for X" vendor comparisons | Ranked comparison pages engines can lift, plus presence in the vendor rosters AI reads |
| MSSP, MDR, and XDR providers | Managed-service and capability questions | Service pages that name the frameworks and outcomes instead of generic security blogging |
| Compliance and GRC (SOC 2, ISO 27001) | Framework and audit-readiness queries | Expert-bylined explainers with schema depth and named credentials |
| Offensive security and pentest | Technical, methodology-led searches | Depth and proof that a specialist wrote it rather than a keyword brief |
| Identity and infrastructure security | Integration and architecture questions | Entity authority and technical accuracy the models trust enough to cite |
Every row runs into the same reality: security buyers trust specialists, and so do the search and AI systems that evaluate you. A generalist playbook with security keywords swapped in does not clear that bar.
Security buyers can tell in one paragraph whether the person who wrote your content understands the field. The difference between SOC 2 and ISO 27001, between an MSSP and an MDR platform, between a vulnerability and an exploit: get any of it wrong and a CISO closes the tab. Google's quality evaluation reaches the same verdict through E-E-A-T, rewarding demonstrated expertise and credible authorship and filtering out content that reads like it was written to a keyword brief.
This is why generic security blogging fails. Ranking in cybersecurity is not about publishing volume, it is about proving, on every page, that a real practitioner stands behind the work. Named authors with security credentials, accurate framework vocabulary, and genuine technical depth are what move you past the filter. The good news, confirmed on the live SERP, is that there is no analyst gatekeeper here: Gartner, Forrester, and G2 show up as trust badges on agency pages, not as the pages that rank. This is a winnable specialist lane for a company willing to speak the language properly.
Security leaders increasingly open an AI engine before they open a vendor list. The engines behave differently, and we optimize each on its own terms: ChatGPT tends to lift one or two authoritative pages and quote them almost verbatim, Perplexity blends many citation-dense sources and rewards tables and checklists, and Google AI Overviews runs on the live index and rewards entity clarity. We track your share of answer on the prompts security buyers actually ask, split by engine, every week.
We have run this play in an adjacent regulated market. Toku, a fintech platform in the compliance-heavy payroll category, went from 0 to 86% AI-search visibility at position 2.4 on its core buyer prompt. That is compounding citation pickup on a surface most vendors in trust-sensitive categories have not started optimizing. The full methodology lives on our generative engine optimization service page, and the mechanics come from a benchmark of 160,000+ AI citations we ran across three engines.
Use this checklist on any cybersecurity SEO agency you evaluate, including us.
Specialist cybersecurity SEO retainers are commonly published between roughly $2,000 and $7,000 per month, and the spread usually comes down to whether AI-search work is included. LoudFace cybersecurity programs start at $5,000 per month on a three-month initial engagement, with no setup fee, because GEO and citation tracking are built in from day one rather than sold as an upsell. After the baseline audit you get a fixed monthly proposal scoped to your 90-day goals across rankings, citations, and pipeline.
Framework fluency and technical trust first, then citable assets, measured per engine against the prompts your buyers ask.
We map how your buyers search and how each engine answers today: who gets named, at what position, and which pages the models pull from. Your starting share of answer, engine by engine, before we change anything.
The foundation Google and the AI engines reward for a technical product: crawl and architecture health, structured data, consistent entity language, and the E-E-A-T signals that prove a real practitioner stands behind the work.
Comparison pages, solution pages, and decision guides matched to the prompts you are losing, each shipping a unit engines can lift, paired with placement in the third-party security rosters and communities each engine reads from.
Weekly reporting split by engine, never blended, tied to branded search lift and pipeline. ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews reward different formats, so we tune each one separately.
Everything that ships as part of the program — no line-item surprises.
What we deliver for Cyber Security companies.
Webflow Enterprise Partner — our primary platform
Daan SmitCEO & Founder | BrandfirmWe are extremely happy with the landing page developed for us by LoudFace using Webflow. The team's expertise and attention to detail were evident from the start, and we began receiving leads immediately after the launch of our campaign. Their speed of work is great, and they maintained excellent communication throughout the project via Slack, ensuring that all our requirements were met promptly. We highly recommend LoudFace for their professionalism, skill, and commitment to customer satisfaction.
We'll run your buyer prompts across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews, audit your technical-trust signals, and show you exactly where the pipeline is leaking.
